Legal Opinion

LOUIS DREYFUS CORPORATION v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 6, 1975No. 73 Civ. 79PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LUMBARD, Circuit Judge:

This is an action to enjoin and set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission (“Commission”) upholding a rate reduction by intervenordefendant Missouri Pacific Railroad Company (MoPac) applicable to the movement of wheat and soybeans from some fifty stations, located primarily on one MoPac line along the Arkansas River, to five Louisiana ports at Ama, Baton Rouge, Myrtle Grove, New Orleans and Port Allen. Plaintiff Louis Dreyfus Corporation (Dreyfus) operates a three-million-bushel, export-grain elevator at Pascagoula, Mississippi, which under prior…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. New York v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. Unique Ideas, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  3. State of New York v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. New England Grain & Feed Council v. United States Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  5. New England Grain and Feed Council v. United States Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Certain Railroads Represented by Southern Freight Association Eastern Railroads, New England Governors' Conference, Intervenors. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Boston and Maine Corporation, the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Maine Central Railroad Company, and Norfolk and Western Railway Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, New England Governors' Conference, New England Grain & Feed Council, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API