Legal Opinion
New England Grain and Feed Council v. United States Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Certain Railroads Represented by Southern Freight Association Eastern Railroads, New England Governors' Conference, Intervenors. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Boston and Maine Corporation, the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Maine Central Railroad Company, and Norfolk and Western Railway Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, New England Governors' Conference, New England Grain & Feed Council, Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 12, 1979No. 77-1324Published
1Opinion of the Court
598 F.2d 281
194 U.S.App.D.C. 362
NEW ENGLAND GRAIN AND FEED COUNCIL et al., Petitioners,
v.
UNITED STATES INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and United
States of America, Respondents,
Certain Railroads Represented by Southern Freight
Association Eastern Railroads, New England
Governors' Conference, Intervenors.
The BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, Boston and Maine
Corporation, the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company,
Consolidated Rail Corporation, Delaware and Hudson Railway
Company, Maine Central Railroad Company, and Norfolk and
Western Railway Company, Petitioners,
v.
UNITED STATES of America and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.