Witt Co. v. RISO, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
HERNANDEZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff Witt Company brings this antitrust action against Defendant RISO, Inc., contending that Defendant has violated the Sherman and Clayton Acts with an unlawful tying arrangement. Plaintiff also brings state law claims of intentional interference with economic relations, breach of contract, and breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing.
Defendant moves to dismiss the four claims. I agree with Defendant that depending on how the antitrust claim is construed, it is either barred by the statute of limitations or fails to state a…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Joseph v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2014
- Crites-Bachert v. Providence Health & Services - OregonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
- Garcia v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Lazarou v. American Board of Psychiatry and NeurologyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023