Legal Opinion

Margolis v. Franks

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 17, 1956PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

In this action which is grounded on an alleged joint venture between the parties with respect to certain uranium *10mining claims, the plaintiff seeks the ¿ppdintment of a receiver and a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from transferring or in any way encumbering or disposing of any interest in certain specific claims located on property believed to contain uranium deposits. The facts are in serious dispute. The positions of the parties clash on every vital point. The plaintiff insists that a joint venture agreement was entered into which is denied…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harrisonville v. W. S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Irwin v. DixionSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  3. Foundry Services, Inc. v. Beneflux CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  4. Hall Signal Co. v. General Ry. Signal Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  5. Huber Baking Co. v. Stroehmann Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. American Airlines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, InternationalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  2. Ashland Oil, Inc. v. GleaveDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1982
  3. Heyman v. Ar. Winarick, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  4. Yonkers Raceway, Inc. v. Standardbred Owners Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  5. Fein v. Security Banknote CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API