Legal Opinion

Heyman v. Ar. Winarick, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 24, 1958PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff sues for an injunction, damages and an accounting of profits alleging misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair competition and breach of contract by defendants. He moves for a preliminary injunction restraining defendants pendente lite from using his alleged trade secrets, manufacturing or selling the competing product, soliciting plaintiff’s customers and engaging in alleged unfair advertising practices.

Plaintiff, a citizen of California, has, since October 1956, been engaged in the manufacture and sale of a finger nail hardener called…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Franke v. WiltschekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  2. Tabor v. . HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Hall Signal Co. v. General Ry. Signal Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  4. Huber Baking Co. v. Stroehmann Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  5. American Visuals Corporation v. Frederick A. Holland and Sam SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. American Airlines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, InternationalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  2. Blazon, Inc. v. DeLuxe Game Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  3. Gianni Cereda Fabrics, Inc. v. Bazaar Fabrics, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1971
  4. American Fabrics Co. v. Lace Art, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  5. Thomas Wilson & Co. v. Irving J. Dorfman Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API