Legal Opinion

State v. Druxman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1915No. 13030PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Humphries, J., entered March 31, 1915, upon a trial and conviction of robbery.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

The defendant, Druxman, and one O’Conner were charged in the same information with the crime of rob*425bery, by wilfully, unlawfully, feloniously and with force'and violence taking from the person of one K. Shimeamoto the sum of $9.35 in lawful money of the United States, on February 4, 1915, in King county, state of Washington. The sufficiency of the information is not questioned. The defendants were tried together. At the close of the state’s evidence, the defendants moved for a directed verdict of acquittal. This was denied. Both defendants were convicted. A motion for a new trial on all the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. MordenWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. State v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. State v. JakubowskiWashington Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. AyresIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State v. HaynesWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State v. ItoWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. State v. HaynesWashington Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API