State v. Ross
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pacific county, Rice, J., entered November 8, 1913, upon a trial and conviction of assault.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
The appellants were jointly charged with assault in the second degree, and each convicted of assault in the third degree; from which conviction, they appeal.
I. An error is assigned in that the court permitted the state to introduce testimony by a witness named Burke as to statements made to the witness by one of the defendants, Frank Ross, after the arrest of the defendants. Witness Burke assisted in the arrest of this defendant. On the return to the county seat, some conversation occurred between witness and Frank Ross concerning the prosecution and the matter for which they were being…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- People v. MurrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Linbeck v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- State v. BanksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- State v. KennedySupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. PavelichWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Heitfeld v. Benevolent & Protective Order of KeglersWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- State v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. GaulWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. . BoswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.