Legal Opinion

Frickel v. Norval & Dial, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 6, 1926No. 16533PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THREADGILL, C.

This was a replevin action brought by Jesse Norval, Jr., and Glenn Dial, copartners, doing business under the name of Norval & Dial, against George C. Frickel, to recover possession of a Dodge Brothers motor ear under the terms of a mortgage given on said car, to secure a note for the purchase price. After the action was brought, and before trial, the firm was incorporated, and during the trial the corporation was substituted as plaintiff. The parties will be referred to herein as they appeared in the trial court.

The note was for $1,435, dated May 19, 1921, and was to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Edwards v. City Nat. Bank of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. MacKin v. Darrow Music Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Oklahoma City Development Co. v. PicardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Hartley v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. First Nat. Bank of Stigler v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. Troy Laundry MacHinery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Mid-West Chevrolet Corp. v. NoahSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Blankenburg v. Norval & Dial, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API