Legal Opinion
Plandome Donuts, Inc. v. Mammima
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 14, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent" Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of North Hempstead, which, after a hearing granted the petitioners’ application for a conditional use permit and parking variance subject to certain conditions, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), dated May 18, 1998, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
A zoning board may impose conditions in conjunction with granting a variance, so long as the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- St. Onge v. DonovanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Shorelands, Inc. v. MatthewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Finger v. LevensonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Nardone v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of LloydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Baker v. BrownlieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Milt-Nik Land Corp. v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Matter of Bonefish Grill, LLC v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Vil. of Rockville Ctr.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Rice v. MamminaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001