Legal Opinion

Shorelands, Inc. v. Matthew

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 19, 1996PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southampton, dated April 15, 1993, which, after a hearing, imposed conditions upon the granting of the petitioner’s application for a confirmation of the validity of certain pre-existing nonconforming uses, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), dated December 29, 1994, which dismissed the proceeding.

*863Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

A zoning board may impose conditions in conjunction with granting a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. St. Onge v. DonovanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Finger v. LevensonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Baker v. BrownlieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Twin Town Little League, Inc. v. Town of PoestenkillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Milt-Nik Land Corp. v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Sadler v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Sautner v. AmsterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API