Legal Opinion

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Dutch Lane Associates

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 28, 1992No. 90 Civ. 7623 (GLG)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOETTEL, District Judge.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On October 16, 1991, this court granted summary judgment of foreclosure on a consolidated mortgage and note held by plaintiff the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) after defendant Dutch Lane Associates (“Dutch Lane”) defaulted on its monthly payments. 1 A judgment of foreclosure and sale was entered in July 1992 and a referee was appointed to conduct the sale. The Referee published a notice of sale once a week for four consecufive weeks in the New York Law Journal pursuant to RPAPL § 231. Defendants claim that no notice of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. United States v. YazellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robert S. Frank v. Bear Stearns & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. LevineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  3. Frank v. Bear Stearns & CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API