Kirtley v. Marshall Silver Mining Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from, District Court of Clear Creek County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This case was originally begun as an action at law, or as a' proceeding to adverse an application for patent to certain mining gro.und, but afterward in the history of the case, which is somewhat complex, the appellants, by leave of court, filed what they called an additional complaint for equitable relief, but which, so far as the case presented here for review is concerned, may be regarded as an original bill or complaint in equity. On the trial below, certain questions of fact were submitted to the jury for special findings upon the evidence, and the findings thereon returned by the jury…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Selfridge v. Leonard-Heffner Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Davis v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
- J. J. Mayou Manufacturing Co. v. Consumers Oil & Refining Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1944
- McClelland v. BullisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
- Kyle v. ShoreColorado Court of Appeals · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.