Streaker v. Boushehri
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtNazarian, J.
This medical malpractice appeal presents questions about the burden of proof under Courts & Judicial Proceedings Article § 3-2A-04(b)(4), known colloquially as the Twenty Percent Rule. After finding that Karen Streaker’s expert witness failed to satisfy this rule, which disqualifies expert witnesses who devote annually more than twenty percent of their professional activities to activities that directly involve testimony in personal injury claims, the Circuit Court for Howard County granted summary judgment against her and in favor of Kristina Boushehri and Capital Women’s Care, LLC (“CWC”).…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Witte v. AzarianCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Harford County v. Saks Fifth Avenue Distribution Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Karl v. DavisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- University of Maryland Medical System Corp. v. WaldtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Zorzit v. Comptroller of Md.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.