Legal Opinion
Karl v. Davis
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 7, 1994No. 711, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRITY, Judge.
The primary issue presented by this appeal is whether appellants, James A. Karl and Pamela J. Karl, plaintiffs below, failed to arbitrate in good faith their claim of medical negligence in view of their decision to rely solely on expert discovery deposition testimony that failed to establish any breach of the applicable standard of care.
FACTS
Following an accident in which his right hand was injured, Mr. Karl sought medical treatment on August 27, 1986, at the Emergency Room of Peninsula General Hospital and came under the care of Dr. Robert J. Davis. Dr. Davis x-rayed the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Attorney General v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Pierce v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Newell v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Oxtoby v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Ager v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Breslin v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Jacobs v. FlynnCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Giant Food, Inc. v. BookerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- D'ANGELO v. St. Agnes Healthcare, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Consumer Protection Division v. Luskin's, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.