Legal Opinion
Hubbard v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 9, 2006No. 04 CV 2409 L(POR)PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LORENZ, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant 7-Eleven, Inc. dba 7-Eleven # 2021-20785’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court finds the motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1).
THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (“ADA”)
“ ‘Congress enacted the ADA in 1990 to remedy widespread discrimination against disabled individuals.’ ” Fortyune v. Am. Multi-Cinema, Inc., 364 F.3d 1075, 1080 (9th Cir.2004) (quoting PGA Tour, Inc. v.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Oliver v. Ralphs Grocery Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Smith v. Bradley Pizza, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2018
- Washington State Communication Access Project v. Regal Cinemas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Mann Ex Rel. Estate of LeapSource, Inc. v. GTCR Golder Rauner, LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2007
- Johnson v. Wayside Property, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.