Legal Opinion

State Of Washington v. Zachary Damien Craven

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 16, 2020No. 78849-3PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) No. 78849-3-I ) Respondent, ) ) v. ) ) ZACHARY DAMIEN CRAVEN, ) PUBLISHED IN PART ) Appellant. ) ) VERELLEN, J. — Jurors should reach a verdict based upon the evidence presented at trial and the law provided by the court. Because this process should be based in reason and logic, a prosecutor makes an improper closing argument by emphatically inviting jurors to rely on their emotions and moral sense as well as their intellect when reaching a verdict. Although Zachary Craven demonstrates the State’s closing…

2Cases cited91 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Of Washington, V. Delane Michael DuflothCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API