State Of Washington v. Zachary Damien Craven
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) No. 78849-3-I ) Respondent, ) ) v. ) ) ZACHARY DAMIEN CRAVEN, ) PUBLISHED IN PART ) Appellant. ) ) VERELLEN, J. — Jurors should reach a verdict based upon the evidence presented at trial and the law provided by the court. Because this process should be based in reason and logic, a prosecutor makes an improper closing argument by emphatically inviting jurors to rely on their emotions and moral sense as well as their intellect when reaching a verdict. Although Zachary Craven demonstrates the State’s closing…
2Cases cited91 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Of Washington, V. Delane Michael DuflothCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021