Legal Opinion

Spielman v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 7, 1984No. 54, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COUCH, Judge.

In Montgomery v. State, 292 Md. 155, 438 A.2d 490 (1981), we held that under Maryland Code (1957, 1976 Repl.Vol., 1980 Cum.Supp.), Article 27, § 640, a defendant convicted of a crime could not be ordered to make restitution to a third party payor, such as private insurance companies. In appar ent response to that ruling the Legislature, by Chapter 477, Laws of 1982, effective July 1, 1982, specifically provided that such an order could be made to provide for payment to third party payors, if they have made payment to the victim to compensate for the loss. 1

The question now before…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  2. Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Janda v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. State Commission on Human Relations v. Amecom Division of Litton Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Coles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Walczak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Langston v. RiffeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Riverdale Heights Volunteer Fire Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. Doe v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Anderson v. Department of Health & Mental HygieneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API