Legal Opinion

Southern California Edison v. First Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 2011No. 55228PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Douglas, C.J.:

In this writ proceeding, we are asked to clarify the proper method of challenging the refund claim decisions of the Nevada Tax Commission. Specifically, the parties dispute whether such challenges should be through an independent civil action in which the district court’s review is de novo, or through a petition for judicial review, which provides for a more deferential review of the Commission’s decision. While we conclude that a petition for judicial review is the proper vehicle for challenging the Commission’s decisions on claims for sales and use tax…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Redeker v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. NOLM, LLC v. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Attorney General v. Nevada Tax Comm'nNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Hickey v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moon v. McDonald, Carano & Wilson, L.L.P.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Alcantara v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Barta v. State, Bd. of EqualizationNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Deja Vu Showgirls v. State, Dep't of Tax.Nevada Supreme Court · 2014
  5. ESTATE OF MICHAEL DAVID ADAMS VS. FALLININevada Supreme Court · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API