Legal Opinion

Haagenson v. Matanuska Valley Lines, Inc.

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided April 7, 1952No. Nos. A-6538, A-6688PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLTA, District Judge.

In the foregoing cases, consolidated for trial, the plaintiff Haagenson seeks to recover damages for injuries sustained by him while a passenger in defendant’s bus as a result of a collision between the bus and plaintiff Frostad’s automobile on November 15, 1949; while Frostad seeks to recover damages for the destruction of his car.

During the noon hour of that day, as the bus was proceeding on its regular run in a northerly direction on “I” Street and Frostad was proceeding in a westerly direction on Sixth Avenue, in Anchorage, Alaska, the cars collided in the northwest…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jones v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Washington v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Casselman v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Schmit v. JansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Sine v. Salt Lake Transp. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Erdei v. Beverage Distribution Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Kidd v. Gardner Associated, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API