Legal Opinion

Schmit v. Jansen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1945PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFaiechild, J.

The case was finally submitted to the jury with the instruction that if the artery were not marked by an official stop sign or traffic signal in conformity with the regulations of sec. 85.71, Stats., then sec. 85.18 (1) applied. This section provides that, when two vehicles approach or enter an intersection at approximately the same time, the driver of the vehicle on the left shall yield the right of way to the vehicle on the right. The court erred in thus charging the jury. “An automobilist, with knowledge of the location of a stop sign, has the right to rely, when crossing the intersection,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Loizzo v. ConfortiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Stabler v. CopelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Firkus v. RombalskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Klas v. FenskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Schlueter v. GradyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Tucker v. MoorefieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Eberhardt v. ForresterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API