Morbey v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Olinlon District Gourt. — Iíon. James W. Bobbin ger, Judge. Judgment for damages, from which defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Ladd, C. J. —
The facts arc fully stated in the opinion delivered by Bobinson J., on the former appeal. Morbey v. Railway Co., 105 Iowa, 46. Several of the points now discussed were there disposed of. Substantially the same evidence was before the court at that time, and the issues with respect to McGovern’s authority to operate the engine as he did, Rahm’s neglect in not stopping it in time to avoid ‘the injury, and Morbey’s contributory negligence were held to have been rightly submitted to the jury. Upon re-examination of the record, we are not inclined to change the conclusion then reached.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. DunleavyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- First National Bank v. PeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Manning v. GasharieIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
- Bell v. Incorporated Town of ClarionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- German Savings Bank v. Citizens National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Harbison v. Briggs Bros. Paint Mfg. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1962
- Childress v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Livingston v. StevensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Platter v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Dessauer v. Memorial General HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.