Ipsen v. Ruess

— This is an appeal from the second verdict and judgment setting aside the will of J. W. Euess. For the opinion on the first appeal, which will serve as a general statement of the background of the case, see Ipsen v. Euess, 239 Iowa 1376, 35 N.W.2d 82. The errors asserted by the proponents are grouped in their brief under three main divisions: (1) error in failing to direct the verdict for insufficiency of the evidence (2) error in admitting, and failing to strike, certain testimony of contestants’ expert witness, and (3) error in the trial court’s failure to submit certain requested…