Johnson v. Microsoft Corp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Gorman, Judge.
{¶ 1} The plaintiff-appellant, Maria Johnson, appeals from the order of the trial court dismissing her amended complaint against the defendant-appellee, Microsoft Corporation, under Civ.R. 12(B)(6). The amended complaint contained three counts: (1) a common-law claim for restitution alleging that Microsoft had charged a monopoly price for its Windows operating system; (2) a claim that Microsoft had violated Ohio’s version of the Valentine Act, R.C. 1331.01; and (3) a claim that Microsoft had violated two provisions of the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act, R.C. 1345.02 and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Volbers-Klarich v. Middletown Management, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
- In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Bennett v. Visa U.S.A. Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
- Bower v. International Business MacHines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- City of Findlay v. Hotels.Com, L.P.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.