Legal Opinion

Strong v. MacK

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 25, 1943No. Civ. 3088PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Respondent has moved to dismiss this appeal because appellant’s opening brief was not filed within the time specified in. a stipulation. Appellant has moved to be relieved from default because his delay and neglect were excusable. Both motions are submitted for our decision.

The clerk’s and reporter’s transcripts on appeal were filed in the Supreme Court on October 13, 1942. The filing fee was paid. The cause was transferred here and the record filed on December 23, 1942. By stipulation appellants were given until April 1, 1943, to file their opening brief. The brief was not filed and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Varcoe v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. People v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Murphy v. KrummCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Clinton v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Deist v. First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. CasillasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. In Re MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. In Re ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Wilson v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API