Legal Opinion
National Organization of Veterans' Advocates, Inc., and Paralyzed Veterans of America v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 10, 2003No. 02-7357, 02-7390PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
National Organization of Veterans’ Advocates, Inc., (“NOVA”) and Paralyzed Veterans of America (“PVA”) (collectively, “petitioners”), challenge the validity of 38 C.F.R. § 20.1106, which was revised by the Department of Veterans Affairs (“the Department”) in response to this court’s decision in National Organization of Veterans’ Advocates, Inc. v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 260 F.3d 1365 (Fed.Cir.2001) (hereinafter “NOVA 7”). In NOVA I we found that the January 2000 revision of 38 C.F.R. § 3.22 was arbitrary and capricious because it was inconsistent with 38 C.F.R. §…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Barnhart v. WaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Aqua Products, Inc. v. MatalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- John R. Ramsey Et Al. v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- Disabled American Veterans v. Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Rodriguez v. PeakeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Faunda R. Hatch v. Anthony J. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.