State v. Adams
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
We disagree with defendant’s argument that the trial judge erred in failing to make findings of fact, and failing to enter an adjudication based on its findings, as to the voluntariness of his confession at the conclusion of a voir dire hearing.
There was competent testimony on voir dire by Officer Horner to support the court’s finding “as a fact that the defendant was questioned by the officer in the interrogation room at *188the Cabarrus County Law Enforcement Center; that he was advised of his rights and understood the rights that were advised him and that any statement which he…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. KeithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- In Re SimmonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970