State v. Richardson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
The defendants assign as error the admission of evidence pertaining to the two television sets which were found in the road and not in the station wagon. There is no merit in this exception. “[E]very circumstance that is calculated to throw any light upon the supposed crime is admissible. The weight of such evidence is for the jury.” State v. Hamilton, 264 N.C. 277, 286, 141 S.E. 2d 506 (1965). See also State v. Taylor, 250 N.C. 363, 108 S.E. 2d 629 (1959). It is always competent in a prosecution for breaking and entering and larceny to show all of the goods lost from a store and to trace…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. . WeinsteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. CottenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. JacobsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. EppleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.