Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Yum

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided November 10, 1980No. 35,657; CMR 436142PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLETCHER, Judge:

We granted the petition in this matter1 in order to examine whether a charge and specification alleging wrongful impersonation, laid under Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934, fails to allege an offense. Our conclusion is that Additional Charge III and its specification are deficient, requiring reversal in part.

The record of trial provides the perimetric facts. Among the charges and specifications to which the appellant entered a plea of guilty was an allegation of a violation of Article 134. Additional Charge III alleges that the appellant

did…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ekberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
  2. United States v. LepowitchSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Forrest Etheridge Honea v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  4. United States v. Gerald Ronald Guthrie, United States of America v. Albert Otis HadenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  5. United States v. David C. RosserCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. PashaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. FeltonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. CagleU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
  4. United States v. HallU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
  5. United States v. ReeceU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API