United States v. Hall
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
SESSOMS, Senior Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, the accused was convicted in a bench trial of larceny and impersonating an officer. Appellate defense counsel invited our attention to several issues raised by trial defense counsel. Those which are not mooted by this opinion we consider to be without merit.
During our initial review we specified the following issues:
I
WAS THE LARCENY CHARGE AND SPECIFICATION PROPERLY AND LAWFULLY REFERRED TO THE SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL?
II
DOES THE IMPERSONATION SPECIFICATION STATE AN OFFENSE?
United States v. Jette, 25 M.J. 16 (C.M.A.1987), which was decided…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. JetteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. David C. RosserCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- United States v. YumUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. CagleU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. FrisbieU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990