Legal Opinion

41 Valley Associates v. Board of Supervisors of London Grove Township

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 2, 2005PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

In this local agency appeal, we consider whether the Board of Supervisors of London Grove Township (Board) erred in rejecting 41 Valley Associates’ (Applicant) 1 proposal to include its property in an “agricultural security area” (ASA) pursuant to the Agricultural Area Security Law (Law). 2

I. Agricultural Area Security Law

The Law is designed to conserve and protect the Commonwealth’s agricultural lands as valued natural and ecological resources, and to encourage the development and improvement of agricultural lands for the production of food and other agricultural…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bray v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Caln Nether Co., L.P. v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Browne v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Commonwealth, Bureau of Corrections v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. In Re SbSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Aldridge v. Jackson TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Penn Street, L.P. v. East Lampeter Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Burkholder v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Bernotas v. Zoning Hearing Board of BethlehemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Newtown Square East, L.P. v. National Realty Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API