Vines v. Crescent Transit Company
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Justice.
This is the third appeal wherein the same cause of action has been before us. Th$ *175two prior appeals, however, were in a different action. The instant appeal is the first appeal in the instant action. The parties are the same in all three appeals.
Plaintiff seeks to recover for personal in j dry.
In 264 Ala. 114, 85 So.2d 436, the trial court sustained demurrer to one count of the complaint and also overruled plaintiff’s demurrer to the plea of the statute of limitations of one year which had been interposed to the other count. Plaintiff took a nonsuit and appealed. This court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vines v. Crescent Transit CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Howell v. HairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
- Bercy v. LavrettaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- West Coast Fruit Co. v. HackneySupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- State Board of Adjustment v. State Ex Rel. SossamanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hartford Accident Indemnity Company v. CosbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Cook v. LichtblauDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Elliott v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Elliott v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1979