Legal Opinion

West Coast Fruit Co. v. Hackney

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 1, 1929PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Plaintiff in error brought suit against defendant in error for damages for the alleged breach of a contract of sale of a crop of oranges and grapefruit. After demurrer to the declaration was overruled, the defendant interposed several pleas, among them a plea of the general issue and one of set-off. On the trial, after plaintiff had offered his evidence, defendant moved for an instructed verdict in favor of the defendant on the ground of variance between the pleading and proof, in that the declaration alleged a contract to sell the entire crop of oranges and grapefruit, whereas the proof…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haile v. Mason Hotel & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1916
  2. National Broadway Bank v. LesleySupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  3. Buffington v. QuackenbossSupreme Court of Florida · 1853
  4. Clarke v. WallSupreme Court of Florida · 1854

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hartquist v. Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1939
  2. Cook v. LichtblauDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  3. Pitt v. AbramsSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  4. Vines v. Crescent Transit CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  5. West Coast Fruit Co. v. HackneySupreme Court of Florida · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API