Legal Opinion
Marion Lambert, Inc. v. O'Connor
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided December 21, 1936No. Patent Appeal 3676PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLAND, Associate Judge.
The appellee, hereinafter referred to as applicant, filed his application in the United States Patent Office for the registration, under the act of February 20, 1905, as amended, 15 U.S.C.A. § 81 et seq., of the mark “VOO” for depilatories, and alleged use of said mark thereon since April 19, 1933.
The appellant, hereinafter referred to as opposer, filed opposition to the registration of said mark on the ground that it was the prior owner and user of the trade-mark “DEW,” which it had used in connection with its business in selling “deodorants and nonperspirants,” and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cluett, Peabody & Co. v. WrightCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Lever Bros. Co. v. Riodela Chemical Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Proctor & Gamble Co. v. J. L. Prescott Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Harris v. Plough Chemical Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bon Ami Co. v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
- Salem Commodities, Incorporated v. The Miami Margarine CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Coty, Inc. v. Perfumes Habana, S. A.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Lone Ranger, Inc. v. CurreyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- George W. Luft Co. v. Zande Cosmetic Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.