Legal Opinion

Buck v. City of Winona

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 7, 1965No. 39724PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

Plaintiffs, as taxpayers, appeal from judgments refusing to enjoin defendants from performing an agreement to sell and convey the city of Winona’s interest in a portion of its public park property to inter-venors for the purpose of constructing and operating a motel and filling station.

As the case comes to us, the determinative question presented is a question of law based upon only a part of the unchallenged findings of the trial court.

The question is whether the city council of Winona has authority to agree to sell and convey by deed its interest in a part of its public…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kray v. MuggliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. Fairchild v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. Headley v. City of NorthfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Reed v. Board of Park CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fahey v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  2. McCuen v. McCarvelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Witzig v. PhilipsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Gilliland v. PORT AUTH. OF CITY OF ST. PAULSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Wolfson v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API