Legal Opinion

In re Pipe Railing Const. Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 11, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is a hearing on a petition to review the order of the referee, dated November 13, 1933, denying the claim of Frederick Russell, in the sum of $4,140.81, as a secured or priority elaim, and allowing the same as a general claim.

The claimant filed a proof of elaim herein against the bankrupt’s estate in the sum of $4,140.81, as a secured or priority claim, based upon an oral pledge of the machinery and merchandise belonging to the bankrupt, as security for the unpaid rent due the claimant.

The elaim in question is based upon a note for $1,426.28 for unpaid rent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re McDonaldDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1910
  2. Lowell v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1922
  3. Wilkinson v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  4. Zimmerman v. Farmington Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1929
  5. Anderson v. DaterDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Ko-Ed TavernCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. Warner v. KaganCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. In re GordonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API