Zimmerman v. Farmington Shoe Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Per curiam
Treating law defenses set up in the answers as motions to dismiss, the court below entered final decrees dismissing the bills, with costs, res adjudicata, without hearing evidence. These rulings cannot be sustained. In effect, counsel for defendants concede that the most -they are entitled to is dismissals without prejudice, remitting plaintiffs to new suits, better pleaded. They are not entitled even to that support. The only questions calling for brief discussion are laches and multifariousness; the other contentions, if not entirely frivolous, should be dealt with by motions to strike or…
2Cited by6 opinions
- In the Matter of Freeport Italian Bakery, Inc., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Matter of Chapter 13, Pending and Future CasesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1982
- Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc. v. GaladariDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc. v. GaladariDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- In re Pipe Railing Const. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.