Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance v. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 9, 1968No. 18790PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, 'Justice.

The plaintiff-appellant, Allstate Insurance Company, had in force a garage liability insurance policy issued to James L. Martin, d/b/a Martin’s Amoco Service Station, and the defendant-respondent, Federated Mutual Implement and Hardware Insurance Company, had in effect a similar policy issued by it to Robert Bailey, d/b/a Bailey and Sons Used Cars. Both policies covered, in addition to the named insured, “any person while using, with the permission of the named insured, an automobile to which the insurance applies * * * provided such person’s actual operation * * * is within…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rakestraw v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  2. Garrett Ex Rel. Garrett v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  3. Crenshaw v. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  4. Eagle Fire Co. of New York v. MullinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States Fire Insurance v. MacLoskieCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JamesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  4. Pennell v. FosterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Progressive Specialty Insurance v. MurrayDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API