Legal Opinion

Williams v. Ohio Department of Mental Health

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided April 22, 1997No. C2-95-456PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SARGUS, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Defendants’ Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment. The defendants now challenge the jurisdiction of the District Court to entertain a suit brought by an individual against a state under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et. seq. Relying on the case of Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1114, 134 L.Ed.2d 252 (1996), the defendant asserts that the Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution deprives this Court of the jurisdiction otherwise granted under Article III. 1

I

The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Schall v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  2. Nihiser v. Ohio Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997
  3. Thrope v. State of OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1998
  4. Teresa Timm v. Wright State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. Hedgepeth v. TennesseeDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API