Gibbs v. City of Napa
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, J.
Plaintiffs Joyce Gibbs, Gordon Eby and Mildred Cunningham sought a writ of mandate directing the City of Napa, and certain of the city’s officials, not to proceed with a proposed initiative election sponsored by Citizens Against the Destruction of Napa, an unincorporated association, Lawrence Friedman and Arthur Stewart, Jr. (hereafter “interveners”). The interveners appeal from a judgment directing the writ to issue.
The proposed election was based upon an initiative petition which procedurally had qualified for a vote thereon by the city’s electors. Its content follows:
“Th…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Blotter v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Farley v. HealeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Housing Authority v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Rossi v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Redevelopment Agency v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Carlson v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Municipality of Anchorage v. FrohneAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- City of Westminster v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.