Legal Opinion

Gibbs v. City of Napa

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1976No. Civ. 38096PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

Plaintiffs Joyce Gibbs, Gordon Eby and Mildred Cunningham sought a writ of mandate directing the City of Napa, and certain of the city’s officials, not to proceed with a proposed initiative election sponsored by Citizens Against the Destruction of Napa, an unincorporated association, Lawrence Friedman and Arthur Stewart, Jr. (hereafter “interveners”). The interveners appeal from a judgment directing the writ to issue.

The proposed election was based upon an initiative petition which procedurally had qualified for a vote thereon by the city’s electors. Its content follows:

“Th…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Blotter v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Farley v. HealeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Housing Authority v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rossi v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Redevelopment Agency v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Carlson v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Municipality of Anchorage v. FrohneAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. City of Westminster v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API