Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. McMonagle

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided February 28, 1992No. ACMR 9001787Published

1DissentJohnston, Judge

This case should be returned to the convening authority for a rehearing. The findings are ambiguous and should be clarified. In addition, the instructions from the military judge were deficient and prejudicial to the accused. Even if these significant legal errors were not present in the case, I would find that the evidence was factually insufficient to sustain the conviction for murder.

I

This case has been presented on appeal to this Court by both appellate counsel on the premise that the appellant was convicted of a violation of Article 118(3) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. That…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. DavisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. United States v. VidalUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. JuddUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  5. United States v. SandovalUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API