Legal Opinion · Dissent

Emmerling v. Mahoning Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh District, Mahoning County

Decided December 12, 2017No. 15 MA 0165Published

1Dissent

DONOFRIO, J. dissenting.

{¶ 46} Because I would find that genuine issues of material fact preclude summary judgment, I respectfully dissent from the majority's opinion.

{¶ 47} The determination of whether or not a political subdivision is generally immune from tort liability for injuries or death to a person is a three-tiered analysis. Rastaedt v. Youngstown , 7th Dist. No. 12 MA 0082, 2013-Ohio-750, 2013 WL 793597, ¶ 10.

*1001{¶ 48} With regard to the first tier, the parties agree that appellee is a political subdivision entitled to immunity from tort liability under R.C. 2744.02(A). Thus, I will…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Glasco v. MendelmanOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Bonace v. Springfield TownshipOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Garland v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Reed v. WeberOhio Court of Appeals · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API