Emmerling v. Mahoning Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs
Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh District, Mahoning County
1Dissent
DONOFRIO, J. dissenting.
{¶ 46} Because I would find that genuine issues of material fact preclude summary judgment, I respectfully dissent from the majority's opinion.
{¶ 47} The determination of whether or not a political subdivision is generally immune from tort liability for injuries or death to a person is a three-tiered analysis. Rastaedt v. Youngstown , 7th Dist. No. 12 MA 0082, 2013-Ohio-750, 2013 WL 793597, ¶ 10.
*1001{¶ 48} With regard to the first tier, the parties agree that appellee is a political subdivision entitled to immunity from tort liability under R.C. 2744.02(A). Thus, I will…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Glasco v. MendelmanOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Bonace v. Springfield TownshipOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Garland v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Reed v. WeberOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.