Legal Opinion

Brinkley v. Smith.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 22, 1902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

AotiqN by B. W. Brinkley against Henry Smith, heard by Judge Tho*. A. McNeill and a jury, at May (Special) Term, 1901, of the Superior Court of Columcbus County. Referred to Clerk of Superior Court to make marginal references.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

The rules of this Court require that marginal references shall be made to the subject-matter necessary to be considered in the discussion or decision of the appeal, Rule 19 (2); that if this is not done the case may be dismissed or put to the end of the district or end of the docket, or continued, as the Court may deem best, and if not dismissed the record shall be referred to the Clerk, or someone else to put it in proper shape, with an allowance of five dollars therefor, for which execution against the appellant may immediately issue, Rule 20; and that a case will not be heard till the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Walker v. . ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Rencher v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  3. Barnes v. . EastonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. Alexander v. . AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Purnell v. Page.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Sigman v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Sherrod v. . DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Brinkley v. Smith.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API