Rencher v. . Anderson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Constitution — Supreme Court — Rules—Printing Records— Appeal. MotioN to redocket an appeal at this Term. The fads are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMerrimon, J.
When this appeal was called for argument at this present term the appellee moved to dismiss it upon the ground that the record had not been printed as required by Rule 2, §11, ¶¶6 and 7. It appeared that the record had not been printed, and the motion was allowed.
On a subsequent day, the counsel for the appellant, after notice, moved, upon affidavit, to reinstate the appeal on the docket, and assigned as cause for the motion, that the appellant was, because of his extreme poverty, “unable to raise the sum required for printing the record by the Rules of this Court.”
The parts of the Rule cited…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Matter of Alamance County Ct. FacilitiesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Walker v. . ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Western American Co. v. St. Ann Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1900
- Calvert v. Carstarphen.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.