Rice, Brown & Co. v. Moore
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Garfield District Court. At the September term, 1889, the court sustained the general demurrer filed by defendants Moore and another, to the petition of plaintiffs, Rice, Brown & Go. They complain of this ruling, which they bring to this court for review.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
On the 27th day of October, 1879, Rice; Brown & Co., a firm doing business in the state of Ohio, recovered a personal judgment against William Moore, in the county of Ottawa, in that state. There is an unpaid balance upon the judgment of $249.30. The judgment became dormant under the statutes of Ohio; but at the January term for 1889 of the court of common pleas of Ottawa county, it was revived by publication. William Moore was not personally served with any notice that the judgment would be revived, nor did he enter any appearance in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bank of the United States v. DonnallySupreme Court of the United States · 1834
- Bauserman v. CharlottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
- Burnes v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Zane v. ZaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1869
- Eaton v. HastyNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johnson Brothers Wholesale Liquor Co. v. ClemmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Union National Bank v. LambSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Waldstein v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Norton v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Good v. KleinhammerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.