Legal Opinion

Harvey Cadillac Co. v. Rahain

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 1994No. Docket 147973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant E-Z Budget Auto Sales, Inc., appeals as of right the May 7, 1991, order of the Kent Circuit Court denying its motion to set aside a default judgment. Plaintiff, Harvey Cadillac Company, cross appeals the circuit court’s refusal to grant treble damages and attorney fees. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

This matter arises out of Harvey’s discovery that the odometer of a 1988 Buick had been tampered with. Harvey had acquired the car from a cus tomer who traded it in after purchasing it from Sharpe Buick, Inc. Sharpe had purchased the car from E-Z.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. White v. SadlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Deeb v. BerriMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Oettinger v. Lakeview Motors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
  4. Gavulic v. BoyerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Lindsley v. BurkeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cresap v. Waldorf (In Re Waldorf)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  2. Universal Underwriters Group v. Allen (In Re Allen)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API