Legal Opinion
Cresap v. Waldorf (In Re Waldorf)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 13, 1997No. 19-30475PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION REGARDING CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
STEVEN W. RHODES, Bankruptcy Judge.
Karen Cresap filed each of these adversary proceedings to obtain a determination that the debt which the debtors Lindsey Waldorf and Reinhart Olsen jointly and severally owe to the estates of Joseph and Jean Cresap is nondisehargeable. 1 Cresap alleges that the debt is non-dischargeable because it is the result of one or more of the following: fraud and misrepresentation, under § 523(a)(2)(A); fraud while acting in a fiduciary capacity,, under § 523(a)(4); or willful and malicious injury to the property of…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Building Communications, Inc. v. Rahaim (In Re Rahaim)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Robinson v. Callender (In Re Callender)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997
- Williams v. Noblit (In Re Noblit)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Transnation Title Insurance v. Livingston (In Re Livingston)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
- Wellinger v. Borton (In Re Wellinger)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.