Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

& SC12-2465 Brett A. Bogle v. State of Florida & Brett A. Bogle v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 9, 2017No. SC11-2403; SC12-2465Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPariente, J.

For the reasons set forth in my concurring in part and dissenting in part opinion in Asay23 and elaborated on inGaskin,24 I would grant Bogle a new penalty phase under Hurst.25

Accordingly, I dissent from the majority’s conclusion to affirm Bogle’s sentence of death.. Asay v. State, 210 So.3d 1, 41 Fla. L. Weekly S646, 2016 WL 7406538 (Fla. Dec. 22, 2016).. Gaskin v. State, 218 So.3d 399, No. SC15-1884, 2017 WL 224772 (slip op. issued Fla. Jan. 19, 2017).. Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016); see Hurst v. Florida, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016).

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hurst v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Timothy Lee Hurst v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
  3. Mark James Asay v. State of Florida, SC16-102 Mark James Asay v. Julie L. Jones, etc. & SC16-628 Mark James Asay v. Julie L. Jones, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2016
  4. Louis B. Gaskin v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017