Legal Opinion

Hall v. City of Austin

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1970No. B-1849PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR

2Per curiam

This is an eminent domain proceeding. We order the appeal dismissed, because no appealable judgment has been rendered by the trial court.

In its petition filed April 30, 1953, the City of Austin sought to condemn a lot 100 feet deep fronting 250 feet on the south side of Waterfront Street for the purpose of constructing and maintaining a freeway, now designated as Interstate Highway 35, and streets intersecting therewith. Special commissioners were appointed and made their award, and the landowner filed objections asserting that the amount of the award was…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCauley v. Consolidated UnderwritersTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Pierce v. ReynoldsTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Kansas University Endowment Ass'n v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Steeple Oil and Gas Corporation v. AmendTexas Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by95 opinions

  1. Van Dyke v. Boswell, O'Toole, Davis & PickeringTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hubenak v. San Jacinto Gas Transmission Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Marin Real Estate Partners, L.P. v. VogtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
  4. McRoberts v. RyalsTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In Re United Fire Lloyds, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API