Legal Opinion

McRoberts v. Ryals

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1993No. D-0715PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GAMMAGE, Justice.

This appeal of a summary judgment in a bill of review case presents again the problem of the effect of severance orders on the filing deadlines necessary to preserve appeals. The trial court held McRoberts’ first counsel was negligent as a matter of law when he believed that a judgment combined with a severance order was interlocutory after the court of appeals clerk advised him that the order was “clearly interlocutory with respect to the parent cause [and that] nothing in the record reflects] that any order at all has been entered in the severed cause.” The court of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Grand Prairie Independent School District v. Southern Parts Imports, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. McCauley v. Consolidated UnderwritersTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Petro-Chemical Transport, Inc. v. CarrollTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1959

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Padilla v. LaFranceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Crowson v. WakehamTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Jamar v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Martinez v. Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Espalin v. Children's Medical Center of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API