Legal Opinion

Callaway v. Armour

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 11, 1951No. 17471, 17472PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

The general grounds of the motion for new trial and the motion in arrest of judgment may be considered together, since both motions attack the sufficiency of the description relied upon by the plaintiff to sustain a recovery by him. The plaintiff testified that he owns land on both sides of the present highway running through the property purchased by him from Richardson, and formerly conveyed to Mrs. Wicker by the heirs of Mrs. Lila M. Richardson. From the testimony of W. A. Broach, and the plats made by him, it appears that the present highway is 200 feet in width. There is no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Board of Trustees of Glenlock Public SchoolSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  2. Miller v. McGlaunSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  3. Callaway v. ArmourSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Peaslee-Gaulbert Corp. v. OkarmaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  2. Atlanta Life Insurance v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  3. McClung v. SchulteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  4. GEORGIA RAILROAD &C. CO. v. FlyntCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  5. Phillips v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API